7 Outrageous Ideas For Your Car Crash Ratings 2002 | car crash ratings 2002

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Two accepted baby cars accept subpar bumpers that could beggarly added than $1,000 of accident from a parking-lot fender bender, a artery assurance accumulation appear Tuesday.

Kia Sedona bumper test toll is $20,20 - car crash ratings 2002

Kia Sedona bumper test toll is $20,20 – car crash ratings 2002 | car crash ratings 2002

Image Source: iihs.org

The BMW Mini Cooper and the Suzuki Aerio, both new for the 2002 archetypal year, rated either “marginal” or “poor” in tests conducted by the Insurance Convention for Artery Safety.

By contrast, the Audi A4 and Toyota Corolla both becoming “good” ratings in the blast tests, which abstinent how able-bodied car bumpers abide accident in low-speed impacts, which about appear in driver cartage or parking lots.

The Honda Accord, the fifth car tested, got an “acceptable” rating.

The convention conducted four low-speed tests on anniversary car, appraisal how able-bodied they performed back their advanced and rear bumpers hit a collapsed barrier, back their advanced bumpers hit an angled barrier, and back the rear bumpers hit a pole.

The Suzuki Aerio, a hatchback-style four-door, had the accomplished boilerplate accident per test: $1,131. The Audi A4 had the everyman average: $216.

Suzuki engineers “simply didn’t do a acceptable job with the bonanza systems back they advised this car,” said Adrian Lund, the institute’s arch operating officer.

The Aerio’s bonanza awning came afar in three of the four blast tests, necessitating backup at a amount of $500 anniversary time.

“Its bumpers abort to do what bumpers are declared to do, which is to abbreviate accident in accessory impacts,” said Lund. “In fact, these bumpers are aloof big-ticket adorning trim.”

While the Mini Cooper fared hardly bigger than the Suzuki, it still netted $800 in boilerplate accident per test.

“It’s alluring a lot of absorption for characteristic styling,” Lund said, “but the bumpers aren’t praiseworthy.”

The affliction analysis for the Mini Cooper was the angle-barrier test, which acquired about $1,500 in damage. Lund alleged the after-effects “disappointing” but acclaimed added BMW cars additionally about don’t accomplish able-bodied in blow blast tests.

The convention accustomed a solid bonanza architecture for the Audi A4’s acceptable rating. The car has accretion confined beneath the advanced and rear bonanza covers that are absorbed to the car with mounts that act like shock absorbers in the accident of a low-speed crash.

Added cars from the aforementioned manufacturer, including the Audi A6 and the Volkswagen Beetle and Passat, accept agnate bonanza designs and additionally accept performed able-bodied as a result.

Most automakers accouter their cars with bumpers abounding with layers of foam, which about do not blot activity afore metal genitalia catch and bend, the convention said.

The cream in the Toyota Corolla’s bumpers did a “reasonably acceptable job” of afraid accident in fender benders, Lund said, but that architecture acquired it to accomplish beneath able-bodied than the Audi. The Audi abiding no accident in the flat-barrier tests, while the Toyota had an boilerplate of $261 in accident in those two tests.

The Honda Accord does not accommodate the energy-absorbing mounts in its bumpers, either. Its bonanza confined are absorbed with mounts that catch on impact, and the cream in the bonanza fails to accumulate the car chargeless of damage, Lund said.

The rear bumpers for both the Honda Accord and the Toyota Corolla were able in the center, but alone so the car would accomplish able-bodied in the pole test, Lund said. Because of that, testers confused the pole from the centermost of the bonanza to the ancillary to get a added authentic admeasurement of the car’s performance.

“We’re seeing auto manufacturers alpha to do this aloof to get acceptable ratings in our test,” Lund said. “But what we appetite to see manufacturers putting on their cars are bonanza systems that will abide accident in a advanced ambit of low-speed crashes.”  

7 Outrageous Ideas For Your Car Crash Ratings 2002 | car crash ratings 2002 – car crash ratings 2002
| Encouraged in order to my own website, on this time period We’ll demonstrate regarding keyword. And from now on, this can be the very first graphic:

Other Collections of 7 Outrageous Ideas For Your Car Crash Ratings 2002 | car crash ratings 2002

Crash test Renault Megane 20   YouTube   car crash ratings 200220 Buick LeSabre Crash Test Ratings   car crash ratings 2002Hyundai Tucson / ix20 | 20 | Frontal Crash Test | NHTSA ..20 Toyota Corolla vs 20 Toyota Corolla (Auris)   Crash Test ..Mitsubishi Eclipse | 20 | Frontal Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet20 ..BMW 20 Series (E20)   Crash Tests   YouTube   car crash ratings 2002Ford Focus 20 door Hatchback | 200020 | Crash Test by NHTSA | CrashNet20 ..20 Nissan Altima (20 Km/h) IIHS Style Frontal Offset   YouTube   car crash ratings 2002

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *